From: Andrew Lunn
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 15:01:36 +0100
> __phy_modify would return the old value of the register before it was
> modified. Thus on success, it does not return 0, but a positive value.
> Thus functions using phy_modify, which is a wrapper around
> __phy_modify, can start returning
Tested-by: Niklas Cassel
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 03:01:36PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> __phy_modify would return the old value of the register before it was
> modified. Thus on success, it does not return 0, but a positive value.
> Thus functions using phy_modify, which is a wrapper around
> __p
From: Andrew Lunn
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 19:04:11 +0100
> Is there any particular reason you have not picked up this patch? Do
> you want more testing? An O.K. from Russell?
I just haven't gotten to it yet, and it's the weekend, so...
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 03:01:36PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> __phy_modify would return the old value of the register before it was
> modified. Thus on success, it does not return 0, but a positive value.
> Thus functions using phy_modify, which is a wrapper around
> __phy_modify, can start return
__phy_modify would return the old value of the register before it was
modified. Thus on success, it does not return 0, but a positive value.
Thus functions using phy_modify, which is a wrapper around
__phy_modify, can start returning > 0 on success, rather than 0. As a
result, breakage has been not
