On 9/1/20 1:11 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: t...@redhat.com
> Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 14:26:30 -0700
>
>> Passing unused parameters is a waste.
> Poorly predicted branches are an even bigger waste.
>
> I'm not a big fan of this change and others have asked for performance
> analysis to be perfo
From: t...@redhat.com
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 14:26:30 -0700
> Passing unused parameters is a waste.
Poorly predicted branches are an even bigger waste.
I'm not a big fan of this change and others have asked for performance
analysis to be performed.
So I'm not applying this as-is, sorry.
It's a
On 31 Aug 2020, at 9:50, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
On 30 Aug 2020, at 23:26, t...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Tom Rix
clang static analysis flags these problems
flow_table.c:713:2: warning: The expression is an uninitialized
value. The computed value will also be garbage
(*n_mask_hit)+
On 30 Aug 2020, at 23:26, t...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Tom Rix
clang static analysis flags these problems
flow_table.c:713:2: warning: The expression is an uninitialized
value. The computed value will also be garbage
(*n_mask_hit)++;
^~~
flow_table.c:748:5: wa
From: Tom Rix
clang static analysis flags these problems
flow_table.c:713:2: warning: The expression is an uninitialized
value. The computed value will also be garbage
(*n_mask_hit)++;
^~~
flow_table.c:748:5: warning: The expression is an uninitialized
value. The
