On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:08:16PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
...
> But still some 'quirks' are possible there: removing and adding
> devices 'properly' would often require resetting of many subclasses,
...Hmm, probably they are always removed from/with the children, then no
problem! (I know, I
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 04:31:22PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
...
> No, this seems fine, thanks. Even better would be a way to get
> the last lockdep subclass through lockdep somehow, but I couldn't
> find a clean way for this. So I've applied your patch and also
> fixed macvlan.
As a matter of
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
As a matter of fact I started to doubt it's a real problem: 2 vlan
headers in the row - is it working?
Yes, apparently some people are using this.
Anyway, as Patrick pointed, the previous patch was a bit buggy, and
deeper nesting needs a little more (if it's can work to
Benny Amorsen wrote, On 01/02/2008 05:40 PM:
...
> The box that shows the problem is "almost-production", so it doesn't
> have a build system. Is there a chance you could get the patch into
> Rawhide or some other testing repository? It takes forever and a lot
> of disk space to rebuild a kernel RP
