On Wed, 2021-01-13 at 11:26 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> On 1/13/21 11:21 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> > On 1/12/21 6:25 PM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > > Instead of re-implementing most of inet_shutdown, re-use
> > > such helper, and implement the MPTCP-specific bits at the
> > > 'proto' level.
>
On 1/13/21 11:21 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
> On 1/12/21 6:25 PM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>> Instead of re-implementing most of inet_shutdown, re-use
>> such helper, and implement the MPTCP-specific bits at the
>> 'proto' level.
>>
>> The msk-level disconnect() can now be invoked, lets provide a
>
On 1/12/21 6:25 PM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Instead of re-implementing most of inet_shutdown, re-use
> such helper, and implement the MPTCP-specific bits at the
> 'proto' level.
>
> The msk-level disconnect() can now be invoked, lets provide a
> suitable implementation.
>
> As a side effect, this
On Tue, 12 Jan 2021, Paolo Abeni wrote:
Instead of re-implementing most of inet_shutdown, re-use
such helper, and implement the MPTCP-specific bits at the
'proto' level.
The msk-level disconnect() can now be invoked, lets provide a
suitable implementation.
As a side effect, this fixes bad stat
Instead of re-implementing most of inet_shutdown, re-use
such helper, and implement the MPTCP-specific bits at the
'proto' level.
The msk-level disconnect() can now be invoked, lets provide a
suitable implementation.
As a side effect, this fixes bad state management for listener
sockets. The latt