On 17-01-22 02:32 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 07:57:17PM CET, j...@mojatatu.com wrote:
On 17-01-22 01:13 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
+ a->act_cookie->data = nla_memdup(tb[TCA_ACT_COOKIE],
+GFP_KERNEL);
+
Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 07:57:17PM CET, j...@mojatatu.com wrote:
>On 17-01-22 01:13 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>
>>
>
>>
>> > + a->act_cookie->data = nla_memdup(tb[TCA_ACT_COOKIE],
>> > + GFP_KERNEL);
>> > + if (!a->act_cookie->data) {
>
On 17-01-22 01:13 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
+ a->act_cookie->data = nla_memdup(tb[TCA_ACT_COOKIE],
+GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!a->act_cookie->data) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ tcf_ha
On 01/22/2017 04:51 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> From: Jamal Hadi Salim
>
> Introduce optional 128-bit action cookie.
> Like all other cookie schemes in the networking world (eg in protocols
> like http or existing kernel fib protocol field, etc) the idea is to save
> user state that when retr
From: Jamal Hadi Salim
Introduce optional 128-bit action cookie.
Like all other cookie schemes in the networking world (eg in protocols
like http or existing kernel fib protocol field, etc) the idea is to save
user state that when retrieved serves as a correlator. The kernel
_should not_ intepret