On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 1:45 PM Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> On 12/17/20 11:30 AM, Victor Stewart wrote:
> > might this still make it into 5.11?
>
> Doesn't meet the criteria to go in at this point. I sometimes
> make exceptions, but generally speaking, something going into
> 5.11 should have been comple
On 12/17/20 11:30 AM, Victor Stewart wrote:
> might this still make it into 5.11?
Doesn't meet the criteria to go in at this point. I sometimes
make exceptions, but generally speaking, something going into
5.11 should have been completed at least a week ago.
So I'd feel more comfortable pushing t
might this still make it into 5.11?
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 3:49 PM Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> On 12/16/20 3:56 PM, Victor Stewart wrote:
> > This patch adds PROTO_CMSG_DATA_ONLY to inet_dgram_ops and inet6_dgram_ops
> > so that UDP_SEGMENT (GSO) and UDP_GRO can be used through io_uring.
> >
> > GSO
On 12/16/20 3:56 PM, Victor Stewart wrote:
> This patch adds PROTO_CMSG_DATA_ONLY to inet_dgram_ops and inet6_dgram_ops so
> that UDP_SEGMENT (GSO) and UDP_GRO can be used through io_uring.
>
> GSO and GRO are vital to bring QUIC servers on par with TCP throughputs, and
> together offer a higher
This patch adds PROTO_CMSG_DATA_ONLY to inet_dgram_ops and inet6_dgram_ops so
that UDP_SEGMENT (GSO) and UDP_GRO can be used through io_uring.
GSO and GRO are vital to bring QUIC servers on par with TCP throughputs, and
together offer a higher
throughput gain than io_uring alone (rate of data tr
