Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:29:52AM CEST, johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
>On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 10:13 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 09:29:18AM CEST, johan...@sipsolutions.net
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 09:19 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > + NUM_NLMSGERR_AT
On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 10:13 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 09:29:18AM CEST, johan...@sipsolutions.net
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 09:19 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > >
> > > > + NUM_NLMSGERR_ATTRS,
> > >
> > > According to the rest of the uapi, this should be rather n
Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 09:29:18AM CEST, johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
>On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 09:19 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>
>> > + NUM_NLMSGERR_ATTRS,
>>
>> According to the rest of the uapi, this should be rather named:
>> __NLMSGERR_ATTR_MAX
>
>nl80211 uses NUM_ so I guess that's a ma
On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 09:19 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>
> > + NUM_NLMSGERR_ATTRS,
>
> According to the rest of the uapi, this should be rather named:
> __NLMSGERR_ATTR_MAX
nl80211 uses NUM_ so I guess that's a matter of convention, but I can
change that I guess.
> > if (err |
Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 08:56:56AM CEST, johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
>From: Johannes Berg
>
>Add the base infrastructure and UAPI for netlink
>extended ACK reporting. All "manual" calls to
>netlink_ack() pass NULL for now and thus don't
>get extended ACK reporting.
>
>Big thanks goes to Pablo Ne
Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 08:56:56AM CEST, johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
>From: Johannes Berg
>
>Add the base infrastructure and UAPI for netlink
>extended ACK reporting. All "manual" calls to
>netlink_ack() pass NULL for now and thus don't
>get extended ACK reporting.
Johannes, I asked already why
From: Johannes Berg
Add the base infrastructure and UAPI for netlink
extended ACK reporting. All "manual" calls to
netlink_ack() pass NULL for now and thus don't
get extended ACK reporting.
Big thanks goes to Pablo Neira Ayuso for not only
bringing up the whole topic at netconf (again) but
also
