> > Asked elsewhere, but best answered here: given that xmit_more delays
> > delivery to the NIC until the last segment in a train, is the first
> > segment in your opinion still the best to attach the timestamp request
> > to?
> >
> > To reiterate, we do not want to need a follow-up patch to disab
> On May 28, 2019, at 2:44 PM, Willem de Bruijn
> wrote:
>> It also appears that other TX CMSG types cause similar issues, for
>> example trying to set SOL_IP/IP_TOS.
>
> See previous comment in v2
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1105564/
>
Sorry, missed those updates. I am still rel
