From: Arkadi Sharshevsky
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 16:15:38 +0300
> The patchset adds support for configuring static FDB entries via the
> switchdev notification chain. The current method for FDB configuration
> uses the switchdev's bridge bypass implementation. In order to support
> this legacy wa
On 08/07/2017 07:59 AM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Hi Arkadi,
>
> Arkadi Sharshevsky writes:
>
>> The patchset adds support for configuring static FDB entries via the
>> switchdev notification chain. The current method for FDB configuration
>> uses the switchdev's bridge bypass implementation. In o
Hi Arkadi,
Arkadi Sharshevsky writes:
> The patchset adds support for configuring static FDB entries via the
> switchdev notification chain. The current method for FDB configuration
> uses the switchdev's bridge bypass implementation. In order to support
> this legacy way and to perform the swi
The patchset adds support for configuring static FDB entries via the
switchdev notification chain. The current method for FDB configuration
uses the switchdev's bridge bypass implementation. In order to support
this legacy way and to perform the switchdev cleanup, the implementation
is moved insid