Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 11:17:35AM CEST, m.szyprow...@samsung.com wrote:
>On 14.08.2024 09:49, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 06:55:26PM CEST, m.szyprow...@samsung.com wrote:
>>> On 12.08.2024 18:47, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 04:57:24PM CEST, m.szyprow...@samsung.com wrote
Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 11:43:51AM CEST, m...@redhat.com wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 10:17:15AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> >index 3f10c72743e9..c6af18948092 100644
>> >--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> >+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 10:17:15AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> >index 3f10c72743e9..c6af18948092 100644
> >--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> >+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> >@@ -2867,8 +2867,8 @@ static int virtnet_enable_queue_pai
On 14.08.2024 09:49, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 06:55:26PM CEST, m.szyprow...@samsung.com wrote:
>> On 12.08.2024 18:47, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 04:57:24PM CEST, m.szyprow...@samsung.com wrote:
On 18.06.2024 16:44, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko
Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 09:49:57AM CEST, j...@resnulli.us wrote:
>Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 06:55:26PM CEST, m.szyprow...@samsung.com wrote:
>>On 12.08.2024 18:47, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 04:57:24PM CEST, m.szyprow...@samsung.com wrote:
On 18.06.2024 16:44, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> F
Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 06:55:26PM CEST, m.szyprow...@samsung.com wrote:
>On 12.08.2024 18:47, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 04:57:24PM CEST, m.szyprow...@samsung.com wrote:
>>> On 18.06.2024 16:44, Jiri Pirko wrote:
From: Jiri Pirko
Add support for Byte Queue Limits (BQL).
On 12.08.2024 18:47, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 04:57:24PM CEST, m.szyprow...@samsung.com wrote:
>> On 18.06.2024 16:44, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> From: Jiri Pirko
>>>
>>> Add support for Byte Queue Limits (BQL).
>>>
>>> Tested on qemu emulated virtio_net device with 1, 2 and 4 queues.
>
Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 04:57:24PM CEST, m.szyprow...@samsung.com wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On 18.06.2024 16:44, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> From: Jiri Pirko
>>
>> Add support for Byte Queue Limits (BQL).
>>
>> Tested on qemu emulated virtio_net device with 1, 2 and 4 queues.
>> Tested with fq_codel and pfifo_fast. Su
Hi,
On 18.06.2024 16:44, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko
>
> Add support for Byte Queue Limits (BQL).
>
> Tested on qemu emulated virtio_net device with 1, 2 and 4 queues.
> Tested with fq_codel and pfifo_fast. Super netperf with 50 threads is
> running in background. Netperf TCP_RR results:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 12:09:45PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 10:23:25AM CEST, m...@redhat.com wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 10:05:41AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> >Oh. Right of course. Worth a comment maybe? Just to make sure
> >> >we remember not to call __free_old_xmit
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski :
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 16:44:56 +0200 you wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko
>
> Add support for Byte Queue Limits (BQL).
>
> Tested on qemu emulated virtio_net device with 1, 2 and 4 queues.
> Tested with fq_codel and pfifo_f
Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 10:23:25AM CEST, m...@redhat.com wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 10:05:41AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >Oh. Right of course. Worth a comment maybe? Just to make sure
>> >we remember not to call __free_old_xmit twice in a row
>> >without reinitializing stats.
>> >Or move the in
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 10:05:41AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >Oh. Right of course. Worth a comment maybe? Just to make sure
> >we remember not to call __free_old_xmit twice in a row
> >without reinitializing stats.
> >Or move the initialization into __free_old_xmit to make it
> >self-contained ..
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 10:05:41AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 09:26:22AM CEST, m...@redhat.com wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 07:45:16AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 08:18:12PM CEST, m...@redhat.com wrote:
> >> >This looks like a sensible way to do this
Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 09:26:22AM CEST, m...@redhat.com wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 07:45:16AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 08:18:12PM CEST, m...@redhat.com wrote:
>> >This looks like a sensible way to do this.
>> >Yet something to improve:
>> >
>> >
>> >On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 a
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 07:45:16AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 08:18:12PM CEST, m...@redhat.com wrote:
> >This looks like a sensible way to do this.
> >Yet something to improve:
> >
> >
> >On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 04:44:56PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> From: Jiri Pirko
> >>
>
Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 08:18:12PM CEST, m...@redhat.com wrote:
>This looks like a sensible way to do this.
>Yet something to improve:
>
>
>On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 04:44:56PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> From: Jiri Pirko
>>
[...]
>> +static void __free_old_xmit(struct send_queue *sq, struct netdev
This looks like a sensible way to do this.
Yet something to improve:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 04:44:56PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko
>
> Add support for Byte Queue Limits (BQL).
>
> Tested on qemu emulated virtio_net device with 1, 2 and 4 queues.
> Tested with fq_codel and pfif
From: Jiri Pirko
Add support for Byte Queue Limits (BQL).
Tested on qemu emulated virtio_net device with 1, 2 and 4 queues.
Tested with fq_codel and pfifo_fast. Super netperf with 50 threads is
running in background. Netperf TCP_RR results:
NOBQL FQC 1q: 159.56 159.33 158.50 154.31agv:
19 matches
Mail list logo
