ixing the comment style.
Thanks
Sukadev
---
>From 59d4b23fe1f97a67436e14829368744ee288157d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 23:00:34 -0600
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 3/7] ibmvnic: avoid allocating rwi entries
Whenever we need to schedule a reset, we allocate an rwi (reset work
item?) entry
On Tue, 2021-01-12 at 10:14 -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> Whenever we need to schedule a reset, we allocate an rwi (reset work
> item?) entry and add to the list of pending resets.
>
> Since we only add one rwi for a given reason type to the list (no
> duplicates).
> we will only have a hand
Whenever we need to schedule a reset, we allocate an rwi (reset work
item?) entry and add to the list of pending resets.
Since we only add one rwi for a given reason type to the list (no duplicates).
we will only have a handful of reset types in the list - even in the
worst case. In the common cas
