On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 12:51 PM Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 12:37:38PM -0600, George McCollister wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 11:20 AM Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 11:21:26AM -0600, George McCollister wrote:
> > > > > If you return zero, t
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 12:37:38PM -0600, George McCollister wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 11:20 AM Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 11:21:26AM -0600, George McCollister wrote:
> > > > If you return zero, the software fallback is never going to kick in.
> > >
> > > For join
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 11:20 AM Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 11:21:26AM -0600, George McCollister wrote:
> > > If you return zero, the software fallback is never going to kick in.
> >
> > For join and leave? How is this not a problem for the bridge and lag
> > functions? They
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 11:21:26AM -0600, George McCollister wrote:
> > If you return zero, the software fallback is never going to kick in.
>
> For join and leave? How is this not a problem for the bridge and lag
> functions? They work the same way don't they? I figured it would be
> safe to follo
On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 5:29 PM Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 03:59:25PM -0600, George McCollister wrote:
> > @@ -1935,6 +1936,19 @@ static int dsa_slave_changeupper(struct net_device
> > *dev,
> > dsa_port_lag_leave(dp, info->upper_dev);
> >
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 03:59:25PM -0600, George McCollister wrote:
> @@ -1935,6 +1936,19 @@ static int dsa_slave_changeupper(struct net_device
> *dev,
> dsa_port_lag_leave(dp, info->upper_dev);
> err = NOTIFY_OK;
> }
> + } else if (is_
Add support for offloading of HSR/PRP (IEC 62439-3) tag insertion
tag removal, duplicate generation and forwarding on DSA switches.
Add DSA_NOTIFIER_HSR_JOIN and DSA_NOTIFIER_HSR_LEAVE which trigger calls
to .port_hsr_join and .port_hsr_leave in the DSA driver for the switch.
The DSA switch drive
