Make it clear that these functions take a device_node structure pointer
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli
---
net/dsa/dsa2.c | 16
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa2.c b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
index 56c43ca7c049..4c11619a818b 100644
--- a/net/dsa/ds
On 07/05/2016 06:59 PM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Florian Fainelli writes:
>
>> On 07/05/2016 03:36 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 03:07:12PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Make it clear that these functions take a device_node structure pointer
>>>
>>> Hi Florian
>
Hi,
Florian Fainelli writes:
> On 07/05/2016 03:36 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 03:07:12PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> Make it clear that these functions take a device_node structure pointer
>>
>> Hi Florian
>>
>> Didn't we agree that we would only support a single
> That is true for the devices I know about, both in and out of tree,
> however, while discussing offline with Vivien it seemed like there was a
> potential need for having a x86-based platform which could need that,
> Vivien do you think this platform could be in-tree one day (if not already)?
x8
On 07/05/2016 03:36 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 03:07:12PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Make it clear that these functions take a device_node structure pointer
>
> Hi Florian
>
> Didn't we agree that we would only support a single device via a C
> coded platform data str
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 03:07:12PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Make it clear that these functions take a device_node structure pointer
Hi Florian
Didn't we agree that we would only support a single device via a C
coded platform data structure?
All the functions you are renaming will never b
Make it clear that these functions take a device_node structure pointer
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli
---
net/dsa/dsa2.c | 16
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa2.c b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
index 3a782ceef716..bdde5d217326 100644
--- a/net/dsa/ds
