On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 15:40:19 -0800, Michael Chan wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> > (b) why
>> > do you encode the two parameters in a single u32? It's the seventh
>> > parameter so it's going on the stack a
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 15:40:19 -0800, Michael Chan wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 11:55:29 -0500, Michael Chan wrote:
> >> @@ -755,8 +757,8 @@ static void bnxt_reuse_rx_agg_bufs(struct bnxt_napi
> >> *bnapi, u16 cp_cons,
> >>
> >> static str
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 11:55:29 -0500, Michael Chan wrote:
>> @@ -755,8 +757,8 @@ static void bnxt_reuse_rx_agg_bufs(struct bnxt_napi
>> *bnapi, u16 cp_cons,
>>
>> static struct sk_buff *bnxt_rx_skb(struct bnxt *bp,
>>
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 11:55:29 -0500, Michael Chan wrote:
> @@ -755,8 +757,8 @@ static void bnxt_reuse_rx_agg_bufs(struct bnxt_napi
> *bnapi, u16 cp_cons,
>
> static struct sk_buff *bnxt_rx_skb(struct bnxt *bp,
> struct bnxt_rx_ring_info *rxr, u16 cons,
> -
Minor refactoring of bnxt_rx_skb() so that it can easily be replaced by
a new function that handles packets in a single page. Also, use a
function pointer bp->rx_skb_func() to switch to a new function when
we add the new mode in the next patch.
Add a new field data_ptr that points to the packet d
