From: Heiner Kallweit
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 21:21:31 +0100
> I see two issues with parameter new_link:
>
> 1. It's not needed. See also phy_interrupt(), works w/o this parameter.
>phy_mac_interrupt sets the state to PHY_CHANGELINK and triggers the
>state machine which then calls phy_rea
On 01/10/2018 12:21 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> I see two issues with parameter new_link:
>
> 1. It's not needed. See also phy_interrupt(), works w/o this parameter.
>phy_mac_interrupt sets the state to PHY_CHANGELINK and triggers the
>state machine which then calls phy_read_status. And p
I see two issues with parameter new_link:
1. It's not needed. See also phy_interrupt(), works w/o this parameter.
phy_mac_interrupt sets the state to PHY_CHANGELINK and triggers the
state machine which then calls phy_read_status. And phy_read_status
updates the link state.
2. phy_mac_int
