Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master):
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 18:15:16 +0800 you wrote:
> Pavel pointed that the return of dma_addr_t in
> otx2_alloc_rbuf/__otx2_alloc_rbuf() seem suspicious because a negative
> error code may be returned in some cases. For a dma_a
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 2:23 AM Kevin Hao wrote:
>
> Pavel pointed that the return of dma_addr_t in
> otx2_alloc_rbuf/__otx2_alloc_rbuf() seem suspicious because a negative
> error code may be returned in some cases. For a dma_addr_t, the error
> code such as -ENOMEM does seem a valid value, so we
Pavel pointed that the return of dma_addr_t in
otx2_alloc_rbuf/__otx2_alloc_rbuf() seem suspicious because a negative
error code may be returned in some cases. For a dma_addr_t, the error
code such as -ENOMEM does seem a valid value, so we can't judge if the
buffer allocation fail or not based on t