From: Roopa Prabhu
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:49:19 -0800
> On 11/15/16, 7:18 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> Although I'd like to entertain the idea of making LWTUNNEL
>> unconditionally built and considered a fundamental piece of
>> networking infrastructure just like net/core/dst.c
> ok, ack. I can
On 11/15/16, 7:18 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Lebrun
> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:17:20 +0100
>
>> On 11/14/2016 03:22 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>>> I prefer option b). most LWTUNNEL encaps are done this way.
>>>
>>> seg6 and seg6_iptunnel is new segment routing code and can be under
>>> CO
From: David Lebrun
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:17:20 +0100
> On 11/14/2016 03:22 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>> I prefer option b). most LWTUNNEL encaps are done this way.
>>
>> seg6 and seg6_iptunnel is new segment routing code and can be under
>> CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6 which depends on CONFIG_LWTUNNEL and
On 11/14/2016 03:22 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> I prefer option b). most LWTUNNEL encaps are done this way.
>
> seg6 and seg6_iptunnel is new segment routing code and can be under
> CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6 which depends on CONFIG_LWTUNNEL and CONFIG_IPV6.
> CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_HMAC could then depend on CONFIG
On 11/13/16, 11:59 AM, David Lebrun wrote:
> On 11/13/2016 06:23 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> This seems like such a huge mess, quite frankly.
>>
>> IPV6-SR has so many strange dependencies, a weird Kconfig option that is
>> simply controlling what a responsible sysadmin should be allow to do if
>> h
On 11/13/2016 06:23 AM, David Miller wrote:
> This seems like such a huge mess, quite frankly.
>
> IPV6-SR has so many strange dependencies, a weird Kconfig option that is
> simply controlling what a responsible sysadmin should be allow to do if
> he chooses anyways.
>
> Every distribution is goi
From: David Miller
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 00:20:55 -0500 (EST)
> From: David Lebrun
> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:26:53 +0100
>
>> v2: fix conditional compilation for seg6_iptunnel.o in Makefile
>>
>> This patch compiles SR lwtunnels support only if CONFIG_LWTUNNEL=y.
>>
>> If IPv6 is enabled a
From: David Lebrun
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:26:53 +0100
> v2: fix conditional compilation for seg6_iptunnel.o in Makefile
>
> This patch compiles SR lwtunnels support only if CONFIG_LWTUNNEL=y.
>
> If IPv6 is enabled and CONFIG_LWTUNNEL=n, then seg6_iptunnel_init()
> fails with EOPNOTSUPP whic
v2: fix conditional compilation for seg6_iptunnel.o in Makefile
This patch compiles SR lwtunnels support only if CONFIG_LWTUNNEL=y.
If IPv6 is enabled and CONFIG_LWTUNNEL=n, then seg6_iptunnel_init()
fails with EOPNOTSUPP which in turn makes seg6_init() fail, blocking
the IPv6 initialization, wit
