Le 08/09/2015 02:01, roopa a écrit :
On 9/7/15, 5:03 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
[snip]
yes, i had submitted the patch you mention above to fix a slightly different
problem that existed then..which
was introduced by "51ebd3181572 ("ipv6: add support of equal cost multipath
(ECMP)")".
Commit "35f
On 9/7/15, 5:03 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
The bug you're trying to fix has been introduced by the commit
51ebd3181572
("ipv6: add support of equal cost multipath (ECMP)").
Commit 27596472473a ("ipv6: fix ECMP route replacement") didn't try to
fix this
problem.
The reason I say "27596472473a (
+ Michal Kubecek
Le 06/09/2015 22:46, roopa a écrit :
On 9/4/15, 1:12 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
Le 03/09/2015 01:44, Roopa Prabhu a écrit :
[snip]
Fixes: 4a287eba2de3 ("IPv6 routing, NLM_F_* flag support: REPLACE and EXCL
flags support, warn about missing CREATE flag")
ECMP was added one ye
On 9/4/15, 1:12 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
Le 03/09/2015 01:44, Roopa Prabhu a écrit :
From: Roopa Prabhu
Problem:
The ecmp route replace support for ipv6 in the kernel, deletes the
existing ecmp route too early, ie when it installs the first nexthop.
If there is an error in installing the sub
Le 03/09/2015 01:44, Roopa Prabhu a écrit :
From: Roopa Prabhu
Problem:
The ecmp route replace support for ipv6 in the kernel, deletes the
existing ecmp route too early, ie when it installs the first nexthop.
If there is an error in installing the subsequent nexthops, its too late
to recover th
From: Roopa Prabhu
Problem:
The ecmp route replace support for ipv6 in the kernel, deletes the
existing ecmp route too early, ie when it installs the first nexthop.
If there is an error in installing the subsequent nexthops, its too late
to recover the already deleted existing route
This patch f
