On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 10:41:47AM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:53 AM Paolo Abeni wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Fri, 2018-09-14 at 13:59 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > > This is a *very rough* draft. Mainly for discussion while we also
> > > look at another par
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 12:05 PM Paolo Abeni wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 11:45 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 11:30 AM Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > > Would love that. We need to care of key decr, too (and possibly don't
> > > be fooled by encap_rcv() users).
> >
> > I jus
On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 11:45 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 11:30 AM Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > Would love that. We need to care of key decr, too (and possibly don't
> > be fooled by encap_rcv() users).
>
> I just sent http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/979525/
>
> Right now
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 11:30 AM Paolo Abeni wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for the prompt reply!
>
Not at all. Thanks for moving this forward :)
> On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 10:41 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:53 AM Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > On Fr
Hi,
Thank you for the prompt reply!
On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 10:41 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:53 AM Paolo Abeni wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Fri, 2018-09-14 at 13:59 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > > This is a *very rough* draft. Mainly for discussion while
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:53 AM Paolo Abeni wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Fri, 2018-09-14 at 13:59 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > This is a *very rough* draft. Mainly for discussion while we also
> > look at another partially overlapping approach [1].
>
> I'm wondering how we go on from this ? I'm
Hi all,
On Fri, 2018-09-14 at 13:59 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> This is a *very rough* draft. Mainly for discussion while we also
> look at another partially overlapping approach [1].
I'm wondering how we go on from this ? I'm fine with either approaches.
Also, I'm interested in [try to] en
From: Willem de Bruijn
This is a *very rough* draft. Mainly for discussion while we also
look at another partially overlapping approach [1].
Reduce UDP receive cost for bulk traffic by enabling datagram
coalescing with GRO.
Before adding more GRO callbacks, make GRO configurable by the
administ
