On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 11:21:45 + Claudiu Manoil wrote:
> >Does it really make sense to implement DIM for TX?
> >
> >For TX the only thing we care about is that no queue in the system
> >underflows. So the calculation is simply timeout = queue len / speed.
> >The only problem is which queue in the
>-Original Message-
>From: Jakub Kicinski
[...]
>Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/6] enetc: Add adaptive interrupt coalescing
>
>On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:56:10 +0300 Claudiu Manoil wrote:
>> Use the generic dynamic interrupt moderation (dim)
>> framework to i
On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:56:10 +0300 Claudiu Manoil wrote:
> Use the generic dynamic interrupt moderation (dim)
> framework to implement adaptive interrupt coalescing
> in ENETC. With the per-packet interrupt scheme, a high
> interrupt rate has been noted for moderate traffic flows
> leading to high
Use the generic dynamic interrupt moderation (dim)
framework to implement adaptive interrupt coalescing
in ENETC. With the per-packet interrupt scheme, a high
interrupt rate has been noted for moderate traffic flows
leading to high CPU utilization. The 'dim' scheme
implemented by the current patc
