On 1/10/18 4:47 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 08:48:37PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 1/9/18 7:40 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
>>> The use of hash-threshold instead of modulo-N makes it trivial to add
>>> support for non-equal-cost multipath.
>>>
>>> Instead of divi
Hi David,
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 08:48:37PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> On 1/9/18 7:40 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > The use of hash-threshold instead of modulo-N makes it trivial to add
> > support for non-equal-cost multipath.
> >
> > Instead of dividing the multipath hash function's output spac
On 1/9/18 7:40 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> The use of hash-threshold instead of modulo-N makes it trivial to add
> support for non-equal-cost multipath.
>
> Instead of dividing the multipath hash function's output space equally
> between the nexthops, each nexthop is assigned a region size which is
The use of hash-threshold instead of modulo-N makes it trivial to add
support for non-equal-cost multipath.
Instead of dividing the multipath hash function's output space equally
between the nexthops, each nexthop is assigned a region size which is
proportional to its weight.
Signed-off-by: Ido S
