David Howells wrote:
> Actually, whilst thanks are due for doing the work - it looks nicer now - I'm
> told that there's not really any point populating the list. Current OpenAFS
> ignores it, as does AuriStor - and IBM AFS 3.6 will do the right thing.
[..]
> On that basis, feel free to make it
Florian Westphal wrote:
> The in_dev_for_each_ifa_rcu helper gets used so sparse won't
> complain when we add the proper __rcu annotation to the ifa_list
> member in struct in_device later.
>
> While doing this I realized the helper only has one call site,
> so move it to where its needed.
>
>
The in_dev_for_each_ifa_rcu helper gets used so sparse won't
complain when we add the proper __rcu annotation to the ifa_list
member in struct in_device later.
While doing this I realized the helper only has one call site,
so move it to where its needed.
This then revealed that we allocate a temp