On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 1:11 AM, Saeed Mahameed
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:44 AM, Alexei Starovoitov
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 06:03:06PM +0200, Tariq Toukan wrote:
>>>
>>> Note that the XDP TX rings are no longer shown in ethtool -S.
>>
>> ouch. Can you make it to show them as
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:44 AM, Alexei Starovoitov
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 06:03:06PM +0200, Tariq Toukan wrote:
>>
>> Note that the XDP TX rings are no longer shown in ethtool -S.
>
> ouch. Can you make it to show them as some large TX numbers instead?
> It would really sux to lose sta
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 06:03:06PM +0200, Tariq Toukan wrote:
>
> Note that the XDP TX rings are no longer shown in ethtool -S.
ouch. Can you make it to show them as some large TX numbers instead?
It would really sux to lose stats on them.
On 28/10/2016 4:07 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 05:52:04PM +0300, Tariq Toukan wrote:
Separately manage the two types of TX rings: regular ones, and XDP.
Upon an XDP set, do not borrow regular TX rings and convert them
into XDP ones, but allocate new ones, unless we hit
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 06:07:02PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 05:52:04PM +0300, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> > Separately manage the two types of TX rings: regular ones, and XDP.
> > Upon an XDP set, do not borrow regular TX rings and convert them
> > into XDP ones, but all
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 05:52:04PM +0300, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> Separately manage the two types of TX rings: regular ones, and XDP.
> Upon an XDP set, do not borrow regular TX rings and convert them
> into XDP ones, but allocate new ones, unless we hit the max number
> of rings.
> Which means that
Separately manage the two types of TX rings: regular ones, and XDP.
Upon an XDP set, do not borrow regular TX rings and convert them
into XDP ones, but allocate new ones, unless we hit the max number
of rings.
Which means that in systems with smaller #cores we will not consume
the current TX rings
