Re: [PATCH net-next 11/18] ipv6: Add explicit flush indication to routes

2018-01-07 Thread David Ahern
On 1/7/18 3:45 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote: > When routes that are a part of a multipath route are evaluated by > fib6_ifdown() in response to NETDEV_DOWN and NETDEV_UNREGISTER events > the state of their sibling routes is not considered. > > This will change in subsequent patches in order to align IPv

[PATCH net-next 11/18] ipv6: Add explicit flush indication to routes

2018-01-07 Thread Ido Schimmel
When routes that are a part of a multipath route are evaluated by fib6_ifdown() in response to NETDEV_DOWN and NETDEV_UNREGISTER events the state of their sibling routes is not considered. This will change in subsequent patches in order to align IPv6 with IPv4's behavior. For example, when the las