On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:36:04 +0100 Edward Cree wrote:
> >> + /* We don't have a TXQ of the right type.
> >> + * This should never happen, as we don't advertise offload
> >> + * features unless we can support them.
> >> + */
> >> + return NETDEV_TX_BUS
On 11/09/2020 16:53, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:31:29 +0100 Edward Cree wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tx.c
>> index 48d91b26f1a2..b0a08d9f4773 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tx.c
>
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:31:29 +0100 Edward Cree wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tx.c
> index 48d91b26f1a2..b0a08d9f4773 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tx.c
> @@ -527,6 +527,12 @@ netdev_tx_t efx_hard_start_
Make it possible to have an arbitrary mapping from types to labels,
because when we add inner-csum-offload TXQs there will no longer be a
convenient nesting hierarchy of NIC types (EF10 will have inner-csum
TXQs, while Siena will have HIGHPRI).
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree
---
drivers/net/ether
