On 02/09/2020 23:55, David Miller wrote:
> From: Edward Cree
> Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 15:35:53 +0100
>
>> +tx_queue->xmit_more_available = true;
>
> I don't understand why you're setting xmit_more_available
> unconditionally to true now instead of setting it to 'xmit_more' as
> seen by this t
From: Edward Cree
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 15:35:53 +0100
> + tx_queue->xmit_more_available = true;
I don't understand why you're setting xmit_more_available
unconditionally to true now instead of setting it to 'xmit_more' as
seen by this transmit attempt. Why would you want to signal
that xmi
Instead of using efx_tx_queue_partner(), which relies on the assumption
that tx_queues_per_channel is 2, efx_tx_send_pending() iterates over
txqs with efx_for_each_channel_tx_queue().
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree
---
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tx.c | 59 ++-
1 file
