On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 1:20 PM David Miller wrote:
>
> From: Dave Taht
> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 10:07:34 -0700
>
> > The longstanding prohibition against using 0.0.0.0/8 dates back
> > to two issues with the early internet.
> >
> > There was an interoperability problem with BSD 4.2 in 1984, fixe
From: Dave Taht
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 10:07:34 -0700
> The longstanding prohibition against using 0.0.0.0/8 dates back
> to two issues with the early internet.
>
> There was an interoperability problem with BSD 4.2 in 1984, fixed in
> BSD 4.3 in 1986. BSD 4.2 has long since been retired.
>
>
The longstanding prohibition against using 0.0.0.0/8 dates back
to two issues with the early internet.
There was an interoperability problem with BSD 4.2 in 1984, fixed in
BSD 4.3 in 1986. BSD 4.2 has long since been retired.
Secondly, addresses of the form 0.x.y.z were initially defined only as
Dave Taht writes:
> The longstanding prohibition against using 0.0.0.0/8 dates back
> to two issues with the early internet.
>
> There was an interoperability problem with BSD 4.2 in 1984, fixed in
> BSD 4.3 in 1986. BSD 4.2 has long since been retired.
>
> Secondly, addresses of the form 0.x.y.
The longstanding prohibition against using 0.0.0.0/8 dates back
to two issues with the early internet.
There was an interoperability problem with BSD 4.2 in 1984, fixed in
BSD 4.3 in 1986. BSD 4.2 has long since been retired.
Secondly, addresses of the form 0.x.y.z were initially defined only as
