Re: [PATCH net-next 03/14] udp: Don't set skb->encapsulation with RCO

2016-05-05 Thread Tom Herbert
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Tom Herbert wrote: >> When RCO is in effect we want to ensure that the outer checksum is >> properly offloaded. Don't set skb->encapsulation in this case to >> ensure that checksum offload is later considered

Re: [PATCH net-next 03/14] udp: Don't set skb->encapsulation with RCO

2016-05-05 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Tom Herbert wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Alexander Duyck > wrote: >> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Tom Herbert wrote: >>> When RCO is in effect we want to ensure that the outer checksum is >>> properly offloaded. Don't set skb->encapsulation in this

Re: [PATCH net-next 03/14] udp: Don't set skb->encapsulation with RCO

2016-05-04 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Tom Herbert wrote: > When RCO is in effect we want to ensure that the outer checksum is > properly offloaded. Don't set skb->encapsulation in this case to > ensure that checksum offload is later considered for hw_features > instead of hw_enc_features. > > Signed-off

[PATCH net-next 03/14] udp: Don't set skb->encapsulation with RCO

2016-05-04 Thread Tom Herbert
When RCO is in effect we want to ensure that the outer checksum is properly offloaded. Don't set skb->encapsulation in this case to ensure that checksum offload is later considered for hw_features instead of hw_enc_features. Signed-off-by: Tom Herbert --- net/ipv4/udp_offload.c | 10 ++