Re: [PATCH net-next 00/14] selftests: forwarding: Add VRF-based tests

2018-02-26 Thread Ido Schimmel
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 02:35:24PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:59:34AM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote: > > One of the nice things about network namespaces is that they allow one > > to easily create and test complex environments. > > > > Unfortunately, these namespaces can no

Re: [PATCH net-next 00/14] selftests: forwarding: Add VRF-based tests

2018-02-26 Thread Jiri Pirko
Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 02:35:24PM CET, and...@lunn.ch wrote: >On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:59:34AM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote: >> One of the nice things about network namespaces is that they allow one >> to easily create and test complex environments. >> >> Unfortunately, these namespaces can not be us

Re: [PATCH net-next 00/14] selftests: forwarding: Add VRF-based tests

2018-02-26 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:59:34AM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote: > One of the nice things about network namespaces is that they allow one > to easily create and test complex environments. > > Unfortunately, these namespaces can not be used with actual switching > ASICs, as their ports can not be migr

[PATCH net-next 00/14] selftests: forwarding: Add VRF-based tests

2018-02-26 Thread Ido Schimmel
One of the nice things about network namespaces is that they allow one to easily create and test complex environments. Unfortunately, these namespaces can not be used with actual switching ASICs, as their ports can not be migrated to other network namespaces (NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL) and most of them