[Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] make non-modular code explicitly non-modular] On
29/09/2015 (Tue 16:32) Finn Thain wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2015, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>
> > On 28/09/2015 (Mon 23:09) Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Paul,
&
Hi Paul,
On Mon, 28 Sep 2015, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> On 28/09/2015 (Mon 23:09) Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> > Hi Paul,
...
> >
> > Why did you choose this approach?
> > What about changing the "bool"s to "tristate"s in Kconfig instead?
>
> Long answer is here:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/201
[Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] make non-modular code explicitly non-modular] On
28/09/2015 (Mon 23:09) Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Paul Gortmaker
> wrote:
> > In a previous merge window, we made changes to allow better
> > del
Hi Paul,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Paul Gortmaker
wrote:
> In a previous merge window, we made changes to allow better
> delineation between modular and non-modular code in commit
> 0fd972a7d91d6e15393c449492a04d94c0b89351 ("module: relocate module_init
> from init.h to module.h"). This a
In a previous merge window, we made changes to allow better
delineation between modular and non-modular code in commit
0fd972a7d91d6e15393c449492a04d94c0b89351 ("module: relocate module_init
from init.h to module.h"). This allows us to now ensure module code
looks modular and non-modular code does