On 2/12/19 9:54 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 2/12/19 9:50 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Florian Fainelli
>> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:17:46 -0800
>>
>>> AFAICT there is no code that attempts to get the value of the attribute
>>> SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS while it is used with
>>>
On 2/12/19 9:50 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Florian Fainelli
> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:17:46 -0800
>
>> AFAICT there is no code that attempts to get the value of the attribute
>> SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS while it is used with
>> switchdev_port_attr_set().
>>
>> This is effectivel
From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:17:46 -0800
> AFAICT there is no code that attempts to get the value of the attribute
> SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS while it is used with
> switchdev_port_attr_set().
>
> This is effectively no doing anything and it can slow down future wo
Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 10:17:46PM CET, f.faine...@gmail.com wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>AFAICT there is no code that attempts to get the value of the attribute
>SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS while it is used with
>switchdev_port_attr_set().
>
>This is effectively no doing anything and it can slow down f
Hi all,
AFAICT there is no code that attempts to get the value of the attribute
SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS while it is used with
switchdev_port_attr_set().
This is effectively no doing anything and it can slow down future work
that tries to make modifications in these areas so remove tha