Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] handle_ing update

2015-05-11 Thread Cong Wang
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > On 05/12/2015 12:03 AM, Cong Wang wrote: > ... >> >> BTW, it should be protected by CONFIG_NET_SCH_INGRESS >> rather than CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT. > > > Sure, I agree, this can further be improved. Feel free to send a patch. I never agree on th

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] handle_ing update

2015-05-11 Thread David Miller
From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 22:51:30 +0200 > These are a couple of cleanups to make ingress a bit more lightweight. Series applied, thanks Daniel. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majo

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] handle_ing update

2015-05-11 Thread David Miller
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 19:05:50 +0200 > On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 10:51:30PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote: >> These are a couple of cleanups to make ingress a bit more lightweight. > > This is plain wrong at many levels. > > You're persisting on embedding the ingress code