On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 05/12/2015 12:03 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> ...
>>
>> BTW, it should be protected by CONFIG_NET_SCH_INGRESS
>> rather than CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT.
>
>
> Sure, I agree, this can further be improved. Feel free to send a patch.
I never agree on th
From: Daniel Borkmann
Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 22:51:30 +0200
> These are a couple of cleanups to make ingress a bit more lightweight.
Series applied, thanks Daniel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majo
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 19:05:50 +0200
> On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 10:51:30PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> These are a couple of cleanups to make ingress a bit more lightweight.
>
> This is plain wrong at many levels.
>
> You're persisting on embedding the ingress code