No objections here.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> On 17-02-02 06:12 AM, Yotam Gigi wrote:
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>
>
>>>
>>> I have no objection to this modularisation but I am curious to know
>>> if you have a use-case in mind. My understanding is that ear
On 17-02-02 06:12 AM, Yotam Gigi wrote:
-Original Message-
I have no objection to this modularisation but I am curious to know
if you have a use-case in mind. My understanding is that earlier versions
of the sample action used IFE but that is not the case in the version that
was ultim
>-Original Message-
>From: Simon Horman [mailto:simon.hor...@netronome.com]
>Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 12:17 PM
>To: Yotam Gigi
>Cc: j...@mojatatu.com; da...@davemloft.net; netdev@vger.kernel.org; Jiri Pirko
>; Elad Raz ; Ido Schimmel
>
>Subject: Re: [PAT
Hi Yotam,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 03:57:02PM +0200, Yotam Gigi wrote:
> Extract ife logic from the tc_ife action into an independent module, and
> make the tc_ife action use it. This way, the ife encapsulation can be used
> by other modules other than tc_ife action.
I have no objection to this mo
Extract ife logic from the tc_ife action into an independent module, and
make the tc_ife action use it. This way, the ife encapsulation can be used
by other modules other than tc_ife action.
Yotam Gigi (2):
net: Introduce ife encapsulation module
net/sched: act_ife: Change to use ife module
