From: David Miller
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2019 15:15:44 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Xin Long
> Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2019 14:48:48 +0800
>
>> Hi, David, I saw this patch in "Changes Requested".
>
> I just put it back to Under Review, thanks.
Applied to net-next, thank you.
From: Xin Long
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2019 14:48:48 +0800
> Hi, David, I saw this patch in "Changes Requested".
I just put it back to Under Review, thanks.
On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 4:33 PM Xin Long wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 6:08 AM David Miller wrote:
> >
> > From: Xin Long
> > Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 00:54:55 +0800
> >
> > > For these places are protected by rcu_read_lock, we change from
> > > rcu_dereference_rtnl to rcu_dereference, as there
On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 6:08 AM David Miller wrote:
>
> From: Xin Long
> Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 00:54:55 +0800
>
> > For these places are protected by rcu_read_lock, we change from
> > rcu_dereference_rtnl to rcu_dereference, as there is no need to
> > check if rtnl lock is held.
> >
> > For these
From: Xin Long
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 00:54:55 +0800
> For these places are protected by rcu_read_lock, we change from
> rcu_dereference_rtnl to rcu_dereference, as there is no need to
> check if rtnl lock is held.
>
> For these places are protected by rtnl_lock, we change from
> rcu_dereference
For these places are protected by rcu_read_lock, we change from
rcu_dereference_rtnl to rcu_dereference, as there is no need to
check if rtnl lock is held.
For these places are protected by rtnl_lock, we change from
rcu_dereference_rtnl to rtnl_dereference/rcu_dereference_protected,
as no extra me
