Hi Eric,
[auto build test WARNING on net-next/master]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Eric-Dumazet/tcp-internal-implementation-for-pacing/20170516-115441
reproduce: make htmldocs
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
include/net/sock.h:476: warning: No description found f
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> BBR congestion control depends on pacing, and pacing is
> currently handled by sch_fq packet scheduler for performance reasons,
> and also because implemening pacing with FQ was convenient to truly
> avoid bursts.
>
> However there are many c
BBR congestion control depends on pacing, and pacing is
currently handled by sch_fq packet scheduler for performance reasons,
and also because implemening pacing with FQ was convenient to truly
avoid bursts.
However there are many cases where this packet scheduler constraint
is not practical.
- Ma
