From: Hannes Frederic Sowa
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:51:37 +0100
> netstamp_needed is toggled for all socket families if they request
> timestamping. But some protocols don't need the lower-layer timestamping
> code at all. This patch starts disabling it for af-unix.
>
> E.g. systemd enables tim
On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 14:44 +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 14:19, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 12:15 +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> >
> > > Also counter question: why is the netstamp code protected by a
> > > static_key otherwise if not for
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 14:19, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 12:15 +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
>
> > Also counter question: why is the netstamp code protected by a
> > static_key otherwise if not for trying to suppress the code path as
> > often as possible if not used? ;)
On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 12:15 +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> Also counter question: why is the netstamp code protected by a
> static_key otherwise if not for trying to suppress the code path as
> often as possible if not used? ;)
Any idea of why timestamping is asked on AF_UNIX in the first p
On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:15:16 +0100 Hannes Frederic Sowa
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 12:09, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 11:11, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 02:32:59PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > > > On Mon
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 12:09, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 11:11, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 02:32:59PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015, at 14:19, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015
Hi Richard,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 11:11, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 02:32:59PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015, at 14:19, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 01:51:37PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > > > netstamp_needed
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 02:32:59PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015, at 14:19, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 01:51:37PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > > netstamp_needed is toggled for all socket families if they request
> > > timestamping. But s
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015, at 14:19, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 01:51:37PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > netstamp_needed is toggled for all socket families if they request
> > timestamping. But some protocols don't need the lower-layer timestamping
> > code at all.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 01:51:37PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> netstamp_needed is toggled for all socket families if they request
> timestamping. But some protocols don't need the lower-layer timestamping
> code at all. This patch starts disabling it for af-unix.
What problem is this patc
netstamp_needed is toggled for all socket families if they request
timestamping. But some protocols don't need the lower-layer timestamping
code at all. This patch starts disabling it for af-unix.
E.g. systemd enables timestamping during boot-up on the journald af-unix
sockets, thus causing the sy
11 matches
Mail list logo