David Miller wrote:
> Actually, reverted, this adds a new warning to the build:
>
> net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c: In function ‘rxrpc_kernel_recv_data’:
> net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c:531:1: warning: label ‘need_more_data’ defined but not
> used [-Wunused-label]
> need_more_data:
> ^
> net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c:475:7
From: David Miller
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 16:38:32 -0700 (PDT)
> From: David Howells
> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 16:52:39 +0100
>
>> Don't expose skbs to in-kernel users, such as the AFS filesystem, but
>> instead provide a notification hook the indicates that a call needs
>> attention and another
From: David Howells
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 16:52:39 +0100
> Don't expose skbs to in-kernel users, such as the AFS filesystem, but
> instead provide a notification hook the indicates that a call needs
> attention and another that indicates that there's a new call to be
> collected.
...
> Signed-o
Don't expose skbs to in-kernel users, such as the AFS filesystem, but
instead provide a notification hook the indicates that a call needs
attention and another that indicates that there's a new call to be
collected.
This makes the following possibilities more achievable:
(1) Call refcounting can
