Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sfp: cope with SFPs that set both LOS normal and LOS inverted

On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 17:48:15 +0100 Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 10:58:32AM +, Russell King wrote: > > The SFP MSA defines two option bits in byte 65 to indicate how the > > Rx_LOS signal on SFP pin 8 behaves: > > > > bit 2 - Loss of Signal implemented, signal inverted from stan

Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sfp: cope with SFPs that set both LOS normal and LOS inverted

On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 10:58:32AM +, Russell King wrote: > The SFP MSA defines two option bits in byte 65 to indicate how the > Rx_LOS signal on SFP pin 8 behaves: > > bit 2 - Loss of Signal implemented, signal inverted from standard > definition in SFP MSA (often called "Signal Detec

[PATCH net-next] net: sfp: cope with SFPs that set both LOS normal and LOS inverted

The SFP MSA defines two option bits in byte 65 to indicate how the Rx_LOS signal on SFP pin 8 behaves: bit 2 - Loss of Signal implemented, signal inverted from standard definition in SFP MSA (often called "Signal Detect"). bit 1 - Loss of Signal implemented, signal as defined in SFP MSA