On 16.01.2019 20:40, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 08:20:43PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> phy_stop_interrupts() is called from phy_disconnect() only. Most of
>> what it does has been done by phy_stop() already which should have
>> been called before phy_disconnect(). Based on th
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 08:20:43PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> phy_stop_interrupts() is called from phy_disconnect() only. Most of
> what it does has been done by phy_stop() already which should have
> been called before phy_disconnect(). Based on that we can do some
> improvements:
> - remove
phy_stop_interrupts() is called from phy_disconnect() only. Most of
what it does has been done by phy_stop() already which should have
been called before phy_disconnect(). Based on that we can do some
improvements:
- remove phy_stop_interrupts() and free interrupt in
phy_disconnect() directly
- r
