On 1/9/17 7:01 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 1:24 PM, David Ahern wrote:
>> Why not use the VRF capability then? create a VRF and assign the interface
>> to it. End result is the same -- separate tables and the need to use a
>> bind-to-device API to hit those routes.
>
> R
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 11:11 PM, David Miller wrote:
> I understand what you're saying, but if you look at how apps can be
> put into hierarchical control groups, and automatically bind to VRF's
> based upon where they are in that cgroup hierarchy, it matches your
> use case precisely.
I think w
From: Lorenzo Colitti
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 02:47:55 +0900
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:21 PM, Andrey Jr. Melnikov
> wrote:
>>
>> > >>> I have no firsthand experience of this myself, but if the problems
>> > >>> that Andrey reports above in this thread are real, then those would
>> > >>> indica
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:21 PM, Andrey Jr. Melnikov
wrote:
>
> > >>> I have no firsthand experience of this myself, but if the problems
> > >>> that Andrey reports above in this thread are real, then those would
> > >>> indicate that the code is not well-supported. Being unable to accept
> > >>>
David Ahern wrote:
> On 1/9/17 8:30 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:04 PM, David Ahern
> > wrote:
> >>> I have no firsthand experience of this myself, but if the problems
> >>> that Andrey reports above in this thread are real, then those would
> >>> indicate that the c
On 1/9/17 8:30 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:04 PM, David Ahern
> wrote:
>>> I have no firsthand experience of this myself, but if the problems
>>> that Andrey reports above in this thread are real, then those would
>>> indicate that the code is not well-supported. Being
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:04 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> > I have no firsthand experience of this myself, but if the problems
> > that Andrey reports above in this thread are real, then those would
> > indicate that the code is not well-supported. Being unable to accept
> > DAD is a pretty serious i
On 1/9/17 7:29 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:08 AM, David Ahern
> wrote:
>> That's news to me. What about IPv6 and VRF is not working or well-supported?
>
> I have no firsthand experience of this myself, but if the problems
> that Andrey reports above in this thread are
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:08 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> That's news to me. What about IPv6 and VRF is not working or well-supported?
I have no firsthand experience of this myself, but if the problems
that Andrey reports above in this thread are real, then those would
indicate that the code is not
On 1/9/17 7:01 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> As others have mentioned, IPv6 on VRFs in client mode is also not
> necessarily well-supported at the moment, and I don't know how long it
> would take for it to be (assuming it can be made to work properly in
> client mode without breaking the primary us
On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 1:24 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> Why not use the VRF capability then? create a VRF and assign the interface to
> it. End result is the same -- separate tables and the need to use a
> bind-to-device API to hit those routes.
Requiring that VRFs for this creates additional comp
David Ahern wrote:
> On 1/6/17 8:30 AM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> > This patch adds a per-interface sysctl to have the kernel put
> > autoconf routes into different tables. This allows each interface
> > to have its own routing table if desired. Choosing the default
> > interface, or using differe
On 1/6/17 8:30 AM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> This patch adds a per-interface sysctl to have the kernel put
> autoconf routes into different tables. This allows each interface
> to have its own routing table if desired. Choosing the default
> interface, or using different interfaces at the same time
Currently, IPv6 router discovery always puts routes into
RT6_TABLE_MAIN. This makes it difficult to maintain and switch
between multiple simultaneous network connections (e.g., wifi
and wired).
To work around this connection managers typically either move
autoconfiguration to userspace entirely (e
14 matches
Mail list logo
