t;> To: Haiyang Zhang
> >> Cc: eric.duma...@gmail.com; KY Srinivasan ;
> >> eduma...@google.com; netdev@vger.kernel.org
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: increase LL_MAX_HEADER if
> >> HYPERV_NET is enabled
> >>
> >> From: Haiyang Zhang
.@google.com; netdev@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: increase LL_MAX_HEADER if HYPERV_NET
>> is enabled
>>
>> From: Haiyang Zhang
>> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 17:34:47 +
>>
>> > But we still keep this busy return in our code
> -Original Message-
> From: David Miller [mailto:da...@davemloft.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 1:20 PM
> To: Haiyang Zhang
> Cc: eric.duma...@gmail.com; KY Srinivasan ;
> eduma...@google.com; netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: incr
From: Haiyang Zhang
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 17:34:47 +
> But we still keep this busy return in our code, just for "weird corner cases".
The queue_stopped condition must be precise.
If you cannot enqueue a maximally segmented SKB, you must stop the queue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
> -Original Message-
> From: David Miller [mailto:da...@davemloft.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 7:33 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: eric.duma...@gmail.com; Haiyang Zhang ;
> eduma...@google.com; netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: incr
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Dumazet [mailto:eric.duma...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 11:37 AM
> To: David Miller
> Cc: KY Srinivasan ; Haiyang Zhang
> ; eduma...@google.com;
> netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: i
On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 10:33 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: KY Srinivasan
> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 07:59:36 +
>
> > I have implemented the scheme we had discussed a few weeks ago. In
> > this new implementation our driver is NOT requesting addition
> > headroom - rndis header and the per pa
From: KY Srinivasan
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 07:59:36 +
> I have implemented the scheme we had discussed a few weeks ago. In
> this new implementation our driver is NOT requesting addition
> headroom - rndis header and the per packet state is being maintained
> outside of the skb. What I am seei
> -Original Message-
> From: David Miller [mailto:da...@davemloft.net]
> Sent: Sunday, November 1, 2015 12:59 PM
> To: eric.duma...@gmail.com
> Cc: Haiyang Zhang ; eduma...@google.com;
> netdev@vger.kernel.org; KY Srinivasan
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: incr
On Sun, 2015-11-01 at 15:58 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet
> Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2015 09:20:59 -0800
>
> > From: Eric Dumazet
> >
> > My recent commit, attaching SYNACK messages to request sockets
> > exposed a too small LL_MAX_HEADER when netvsc_drv.c is in use,
> > because this
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2015 09:20:59 -0800
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> My recent commit, attaching SYNACK messages to request sockets
> exposed a too small LL_MAX_HEADER when netvsc_drv.c is in use,
> because this driver sets a needed_headroom of 220 bytes.
>
> Increase LL_MAX_HEADE
From: Eric Dumazet
My recent commit, attaching SYNACK messages to request sockets
exposed a too small LL_MAX_HEADER when netvsc_drv.c is in use,
because this driver sets a needed_headroom of 220 bytes.
Increase LL_MAX_HEADER in this case, to avoid a realloc of all
TCP frames.
In another patch,
12 matches
Mail list logo
