From: Jakub Kicinski
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 13:46:47 -0700
> bpf_getsockopt bpf call sets the ret variable to zero and
> never changes it. What's worse in case CONFIG_INET is
> not selected the variable is completely unused generating
> a warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski
> Reviewed-b
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 01:46:47PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> bpf_getsockopt bpf call sets the ret variable to zero and
> never changes it. What's worse in case CONFIG_INET is
> not selected the variable is completely unused generating
> a warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski
> Reviewe
On 10/30/2017 09:46 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
bpf_getsockopt bpf call sets the ret variable to zero and
never changes it. What's worse in case CONFIG_INET is
not selected the variable is completely unused generating
a warning.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet
Acked-
Good catch, thanks!
On 10/30/17, 1:47 PM, "Jakub Kicinski" wrote:
bpf_getsockopt bpf call sets the ret variable to zero and
never changes it. What's worse in case CONFIG_INET is
not selected the variable is completely unused generating
a warning.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Ki
bpf_getsockopt bpf call sets the ret variable to zero and
never changes it. What's worse in case CONFIG_INET is
not selected the variable is completely unused generating
a warning.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet
---
net/core/filter.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insert
