From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 18:26:53 -0700
> Due to a typo we would always be using the MIB counter width of the
> first element of the counter array instead of the current element, and
> we would always be accessing the register statistics with a 64-bits
> read, while some coul
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 06:26:53PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Due to a typo we would always be using the MIB counter width of the
> first element of the counter array instead of the current element, and
> we would always be accessing the register statistics with a 64-bits
> read, while some c
Due to a typo we would always be using the MIB counter width of the
first element of the counter array instead of the current element, and
we would always be accessing the register statistics with a 64-bits
read, while some could be 32-bits. This got unnoticed in testing with
MDIO and SRAB which to
