On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 12:41:49PM +1000, Russell Strong wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 23:55:05 +0100 Guillaume Nault wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 06:24:46PM +1000, Russell Strong wrote:
>
> I was wondering if one patch would be acceptable, or should it be broken
> up? If broken up. It woul
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 23:55:05 +0100
Guillaume Nault wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 06:24:46PM +1000, Russell Strong wrote:
> > From 2f27f92d5a6f4dd69ac4af32cdb51ba8d2083606 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Russell Strong
> > Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 18:12:43 +1000
> > Subject: [PATCH] DSCP in I
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 06:24:46PM +1000, Russell Strong wrote:
> From 2f27f92d5a6f4dd69ac4af32cdb51ba8d2083606 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Russell Strong
> Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 18:12:43 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] DSCP in IPv4 routing v2
>
> This patch allows the use of DSCP values in routin
>From 2f27f92d5a6f4dd69ac4af32cdb51ba8d2083606 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Russell Strong
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 18:12:43 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] DSCP in IPv4 routing v2
This patch allows the use of DSCP values in routing
The following macros define the scope of IPv4 TOS
bits used in routing d