Re: [PATCH net-next] ifb: support more features

2016-05-06 Thread Eric Dumazet
On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 16:41 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > From: Eric Dumazet > > When using ifb+netem on ingress on SIT/IPIP/GRE traffic, > GRO packets are not properly processed. > > Segmentation should not be forced, as ifb is already adding > quite a performance hit. Please ignore, wrong vers

[PATCH net-next] ifb: support more features

2016-05-06 Thread Eric Dumazet
From: Eric Dumazet When using ifb+netem on ingress on SIT/IPIP/GRE traffic, GRO packets are not properly processed. Segmentation should not be forced, as ifb is already adding quite a performance hit. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet --- drivers/net/ifb.c |3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+