Re: [PATCH net-next] cxgb4: Update IngPad and IngPack values

2017-03-22 Thread David Miller
From: Ganesh Goudar Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 14:22:38 +0530 > From: Arjun Vynipadath > > We are using the smallest padding boundary (8 bytes), which isn't > smaller than the Memory Controller Read/Write Size > > We get best performance in 100G when the Packing Boundary is a multiple > of the Max

[PATCH net-next] cxgb4: Update IngPad and IngPack values

2017-03-20 Thread Ganesh Goudar
From: Arjun Vynipadath We are using the smallest padding boundary (8 bytes), which isn't smaller than the Memory Controller Read/Write Size We get best performance in 100G when the Packing Boundary is a multiple of the Maximum Payload Size. Its related to inefficient chopping of DMA packets by P