On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 07:10:47PM +0200, Paul Blakey wrote:
>
> I know but I wanted to show the inner structure for the failure case, iirc
> walk doesn't provide this.
Fair enough.
Acked-by: Herbert Xu
--
Email: Herbert Xu
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor
On 08/03/2018 17:58, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 01:54:57PM +0200, Paul Blakey wrote:
Suppress "suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage!" on duplicate
insertion test.
Fixes: 499ac3b60f65 ('test_rhashtable: add test case for rhl_table with
duplicate objects')
Signed-off-by:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 01:54:57PM +0200, Paul Blakey wrote:
> Suppress "suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage!" on duplicate
> insertion test.
>
> Fixes: 499ac3b60f65 ('test_rhashtable: add test case for rhl_table with
> duplicate objects')
> Signed-off-by: Paul Blakey
This shouldn't be
Suppress "suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage!" on duplicate
insertion test.
Fixes: 499ac3b60f65 ('test_rhashtable: add test case for rhl_table with
duplicate objects')
Signed-off-by: Paul Blakey
---
lib/test_rhashtable.c | 14 +-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletion
