On 02/25/2019 08:08 PM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> Hi David,
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 07:15:26PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 2/25/19 6:55 PM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
>>> Just as I said, this issue only occurs when IPv6 is disabled at boot time
>>> as there is no IPv6 route entry. Disable ipv6 on speci
Hi David,
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 07:15:26PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> On 2/25/19 6:55 PM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > Just as I said, this issue only occurs when IPv6 is disabled at boot time
> > as there is no IPv6 route entry. Disable ipv6 on specific interface should
> > not be affected(IPv6 route
On 2/25/19 6:55 PM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> Just as I said, this issue only occurs when IPv6 is disabled at boot time
> as there is no IPv6 route entry. Disable ipv6 on specific interface should
> not be affected(IPv6 route/fib has inited). So I think use ipv6_mod_enabled()
> would be more suitable in
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 09:57:42AM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> On 2/25/19 9:39 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >>> On 02/24/2019 08:12 PM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> ipv6_mod_enabled() is more safe and gentle to check if ipv6 is disabled
> at running time.
> >>>
> >>> Why is it better exactly ?
> >>>
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 08:39:27AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >> On 02/24/2019 08:12 PM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> >>> ipv6_mod_enabled() is more safe and gentle to check if ipv6 is disabled
> >>> at running time.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> Why is it better exactly ?
> >>
> >> IPv6 can be enabled on the hos
On 2/25/19 9:39 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
> On 02/25/2019 12:17 AM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 08:24:51PM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/24/2019 08:12 PM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
ipv6_mod_enabled() is more safe and gentle to check if ipv6 is disabled
at run
On 02/25/2019 12:17 AM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 08:24:51PM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 02/24/2019 08:12 PM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
>>> ipv6_mod_enabled() is more safe and gentle to check if ipv6 is disabled
>>> at running time.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Why is it better exactly ?
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 08:24:51PM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
> On 02/24/2019 08:12 PM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > ipv6_mod_enabled() is more safe and gentle to check if ipv6 is disabled
> > at running time.
> >
>
>
> Why is it better exactly ?
>
> IPv6 can be enabled on the host, but disable
On 02/24/2019 08:12 PM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> ipv6_mod_enabled() is more safe and gentle to check if ipv6 is disabled
> at running time.
>
Why is it better exactly ?
IPv6 can be enabled on the host, but disabled per device
/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/{name}/disable_ipv6
> Fixes: 173656accaf5 (
ipv6_mod_enabled() is more safe and gentle to check if ipv6 is disabled
at running time.
Fixes: 173656accaf5 ("sit: check if IPv6 enabled before calling
ip6_err_gen_icmpv6_unreach()")
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu
---
net/ipv6/sit.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
10 matches
Mail list logo