On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:16:50PM +0900, Xin Long wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 9:29 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 05:02:11PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> > > sctp_assoc_update_frag_point() should be called whenever asoc->pathmtu
> > > changes, but we missed o
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 9:29 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 05:02:11PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> > sctp_assoc_update_frag_point() should be called whenever asoc->pathmtu
> > changes, but we missed one place in sctp_association_init(). It would
> > cause frag_point is
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 05:02:11PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> sctp_assoc_update_frag_point() should be called whenever asoc->pathmtu
> changes, but we missed one place in sctp_association_init(). It would
> cause frag_point is zero when sending data.
>
> As says in Jakub's reproducer, if sp->pathmtu
sctp_assoc_update_frag_point() should be called whenever asoc->pathmtu
changes, but we missed one place in sctp_association_init(). It would
cause frag_point is zero when sending data.
As says in Jakub's reproducer, if sp->pathmtu is set by socketopt, the
new asoc->pathmtu inherits it in sctp_asso