From: Xin Long
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 18:40:18 +0800
> After changing rhashtable_walk_start to return void, start_fail would
> never be set other value than 0, and the checking for start_fail is
> pointless, so remove it.
>
> Fixes: 97a6ec4ac021 ("rhashtable: Change rhashtable_walk_start to retu
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 06:40:18PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> After changing rhashtable_walk_start to return void, start_fail would
> never be set other value than 0, and the checking for start_fail is
> pointless, so remove it.
>
> Fixes: 97a6ec4ac021 ("rhashtable: Change rhashtable_walk_start to r
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 06:40:18PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> After changing rhashtable_walk_start to return void, start_fail would
> never be set other value than 0, and the checking for start_fail is
> pointless, so remove it.
>
> Fixes: 97a6ec4ac021 ("rhashtable: Change rhashtable_walk_start to r
After changing rhashtable_walk_start to return void, start_fail would
never be set other value than 0, and the checking for start_fail is
pointless, so remove it.
Fixes: 97a6ec4ac021 ("rhashtable: Change rhashtable_walk_start to return void")
Signed-off-by: Xin Long
---
net/sctp/proc.c | 4